by Warren B. Smith
Many prominent New Age figures have stated that the foundational teaching of the New World Religion is the “immanence”of God (i.e., God “in” everything). Benjamin Creme, New Age leader and spokesperson for the false New Age “Christ” Maitreya, says:
But eventually a new world religion will be inaugurated which will be a fusion and synthesis of the approach of the East and the approach of the West. The Christ will bring together, not simply Christianity and Buddhism, but the concept of God transcendent–outside of His creation–and also the concept of God immanent in all creation–in man and all creation.1
New Age matriarch Alice Bailey also describes how the ultimate path to God in the New World Religion will be based on accepting the teaching of God’s “immanence”–God “in” everything. Bailey writes:
. . . a fresh orientation to divinity and to the acceptance of the fact of God Transcendent and of God Immanent within every form of life.
These are the foundational truths upon which the world religion of the future will rest.2
. . . Robert Schuller has already publicly aligned himself with this foundational teaching of the New World Religion. On November 9, 2003, in an Hour of Power sermon broadcast to millions of people around the world, Schuller stated that over the previous several years his increased understanding of God’s “immanence” had caused his faith to become “deeper, broader, and richer more than ever.” He then proclaimed: “God is alive and He is in every single human being!”3
. . . Leonard Sweet presents this same teaching of immanence in his book Quantum Spirituality. While Sweet praises, promotes and even consults with New Age leaders, he also teaches that God is immanent–“in the very substance of creation [panentheism].”4 Eugene Peterson’s “as above, so below” in the Lord’s Prayer carries this same immanent God “in” everything message.5
If this immanent “God in everything” new worldview is where the church is heading, how might church leaders . . . present this view without looking like they’ve “flip-flopped” on their Christian faith? Again, the answer seems to be the intent to wed this God “in” everything immanence with the “new science” and the “new math.” In other words, new findings from fractal theory, chaos theory, and quantum physics will seem to prove that God is “in” everything–“as above, so below.” Given that Leonard Sweet’s quantum spirituality may signify where . . . church leaders are headed, it is important to take a closer look at how New Age leaders are presenting their quantum spirituality.
The New Age/New Spirituality is already heralding quantum physics as a “scientific” basis for their contention that God is not only transcendent but also immanent–“in” everyone and everything. Physicist Fritjof Capra’s 1975 best-selling book on quantum physics–The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism–was the first to present this proposed scientific/spiritual model to a mass audience. In it, Capra explains that he gained new spiritual insights through a mystical experience he had sitting on a beach in Santa Cruz, California in 1969:
Five years ago, I had a beautiful experience which set me on a road that has led to the writing of this book. I was sitting by the ocean one late summer afternoon, watching the waves rolling in and feeling the rhythm of my breathing, when I suddenly became aware of my whole environment as being engaged in a gigantic cosmic dance. . . . As I sat on that beach my former experiences [research in high-energy physics] came to life; I ‘saw’ cascades of energy coming down from outer space, in which particles were created and destroyed in rhythmic pulses; I ‘saw’ the atoms of the elements and those of my body participating in this cosmic dance of energy; I felt its rhythm and I ‘heard’ its sound, and at that moment I knew that this was the Dance of Shiva, the Lord of Dancers worshipped by the Hindus.6
Commenting on his experience thirty years later, Capra writes that back in 1970 he “knew with absolute certainty that the parallels between modern physics and Eastern mysticism would someday be common knowledge.”7 In 1999, in a twenty-fifth anniversary edition of his book, Capra reflects on the fact that The Tao of Physics had sold more than a million copies over the years and had been translated into at least twelve languages:
What did The Tao of Physics touch off in all these people? What was it they had experienced themselves? I had come to believe that the recognition of the similarities between modern physics and Eastern mysticism is part of a much larger movement, of a fundamental change of worldviews, or paradigms, in science and society, which is now happening throughout Europe and North America and which amounts to a profound cultural transformation. This transformation, this profound change of consciousness, is what so many people have felt intuitively over the past two or three decades, and this is why The Tao of Physics has struck such a responsive chord.8
The awareness of the unity and mutual interrelation of all things and events, the experience of all phenomena as manifestations of a basic oneness, is also the most important common characteristic of Eastern worldviews. One could say it is the very essence of those views, as it is of all mystical traditions. All things are seen as interdependent, inseparable, and as transient patterns of the same ultimate reality.9
Fritjof Capra then describes the union of mysticism and the new physics as the “new spirituality” that is “now being developed by many groups and movements, both within and outside the churches.” As an example of how this “new spirituality” is moving into the church, he refers to one of Leonard Sweet’s “role models” and “heroes”–Matthew Fox:
On the other hand, I also believe that our own spiritual traditions will have to undergo some radical changes in order to be in harmony with the values of the new paradigm. The spirituality corresponding to the new vision of reality I have been outlining here is likely to be an ecological, earth-oriented, postpatriarchal spirituality. This kind of new spirituality is now being developed by many groups and movements, both within and outside the churches. An example would be the creation-centered spirituality promoted by Matthew Fox and his colleagues.10
A perfect example of Capra’s reference to how this quantum â€œnew spiritualityâ€ is being developed in churches is exemplified by Margaret Wheatley’s appearance at the Leadership Network’s May 2000 “Exploring off the Map” conference with Leonard Sweet and others. . . . Wheatley first encountered the “new science” in Fritjof Capra’s book The Turning Point, as noted in the updated introduction of her book Leadership and the New Science:
I opened my first book on the new science–Fritjof Capra’s The Turning Point, which describes the new world view emerging from quantum physics. This provided my first glimpse of a new way of perceiving the world, one that comprehended its processes of change, its deeply patterned nature, and its dense webs of connections.11
To further illustrate how pervasive this quantum spirituality has become in the church, consider an organization called VantagePoint3. This South Dakota-based group has developed a three-phase “spiritual formation” program called The VantagePoint3 Process (or L3), which incidentally is being used by a growing number of churches across North America. In the first phase–“Emerging Leaders”–a quote and summation of Margaret Wheatley is used to teach one of the points in that phase. The curriculum quotes Wheatley from her book Leadership and the New Science and emphasizes her view on “relationship” and “interconnection.”12 The fact that this program points to Wheatley demonstrates yet another way that quantum physics and quantum spirituality is already in the church. It is worth noting that this curriculum uses Galatians 3:27-28 to partially summarize what Wheatley has to say. But while Galatians 3 speaks of “Christ Jesus,” Wheatley’s quantum “Christ” is the universal “Christ” of quantum “oneness.” VantagePoint3’s use of Wheatley to teach about “Christ” is a perfect example of what Fritjof Capra described as this new spirituality being developed within the churches.
The VantagePoint3 Process also cites materials by Leonard Sweet, Peter Senge, and Ken Blanchard. All three were featured with Wheatley at the “Exploring off the Map” conference organized by Bob Buford and Leadership Network.
Another example of how quantum physics has already entered the church is through the ministry of Annette Capps–the daughter of best-selling author and charismatic pastor Charles Capps. There are over 100,000 copies of Annette Capps’ booklet Quantum Faith in print. In the booklet, she presents a Christian faith compatible with the so-called “scientific” principles of quantum physics and as such is also compatible with the so-called “scientific” principles of the New Age/New Spirituality. She even refers readers to New Age leader Gary Zukav’s book The Dancing Wu Li Masters–An Overview of the New Physics.13 In her booklet, she writes:
As I studied the theories of quantum physics, I was reminded of a prophecy given by my father, author and teacher Charles Capps, “Some things which have required faith to believe will no longer require faith, for it will be proven to be scientific fact.”14
Obviously, authors like Gary Zukav and Fritjof Capra have had a huge influence not only in the world, but also in the church. Capra, a New Age physicist and Aquarian conspirator, is mentioned frequently in Marilyn Ferguson’s book The Aquarian Conspiracy.15 In addition, countless books and articles have been written about the quantum aspects of the “new science” and the “new spirituality” since the publication of Capra’s The Tao of Physics and The Turning Point. Gary Zukav and his writings on quantum physics were praised and featured years ago by Oprah Winfrey on the Oprah Winfrey Show.16 William Young’s best-selling book The Shack is just the latest in a long line of books that deal directly or indirectly with quantum physics and quantum spirituality. And like Wheatley’s book Leadership and the New Science but on a much larger scale, Young’s book is also having great influence by subtly introducing quantum physics and quantum spirituality into the church. . . .
In his 2009 book So Beautiful, Leonard Sweet underscores [this] quantum “relational worldview”17 by favorably quoting from William Young’s The Shack regarding relationship.18 He also tells readers to look to Margaret Wheatley’s Leadership and the New Science to further understand his quantum view on the “spiritual and social significance of relationship.”19
[The question must be asked] Are they [Christian and emerging leaders] about to take a big “quantum leap” into the New Spirituality of a New Age that is based on the findings of the “new science”? (This has been an excerpt from Warren Smith’s new 2009 book, A “Wonderful” Deception, chapter 13. For more on The Shack, see chapter 12 of A “Wonderful” Deception.)
1. Benjamin Creme, The Reappearance of the Christ and the Masters of Wisdom (London, England: The Tara Press, 1980), p. 88; see also: Warren Smith, Deceived on Purpose, op. cit, p. 156.
2. Alice Bailey, The Reappearance of the Christ, op. cit, p. 150; see also: Smith, Deceived on Purpose, op. cit., p. 156.
3. Hour of Power, Robert H. Schuller, Program #1762, “God’s Word: Rebuild, Renew, Restore,” November 9, 2003, op. cit.
4. Leonard Sweet, Quantum Spirituality, p. 125.
5. Warren Smith, Deceived on Purpose, pp. 32-34; Ronald S. Miller and the Editors of New Age Journal, As Above, So Below: Paths to Spiritual Renewal in Daily Life (Los Angeles, CA: Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc., 1992), p. xi.
6. Fritjof Capra, The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism (Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications, Inc., 1999), p. 11.
7. Ibid., p. 323.
8. Ibid., pp. 324-325.
9. Ibid., p. 330.
10. Ibid., p. 341.
11. Margaret J. Wheatley, Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in a Chaotic World (San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Inc., 3rd ed., 2006), pp. 3-4, brought to my attention by Discernment Research Group.
12. Emerging Leaders: Relational Foundations of Leadership (Sioux Falls, SD, Vantage Point3, 2006, http://www.vantagepoint3.org/fileadmin/main/tour/EMS3%20WebSamples.pdf), p. 52; this information provided by Jennifer Pekich.
13. Annette Capps, Quantum Faith (England, AR: Capps Publishing, 2003, 2007), p. 4, booklet brought to my attention by Larry DeBruyn.
14. Ibid., p. 6.
15. Marilyn Ferguson, The Aquarian Conspiracy, pp. 145, 149-150, 152, 172, 261, 374.
16. Gary Zukav’s first appearance on Oprah was in October 1998. This propelled his book The Seat of the Soul to the top of the New York Times best-seller list for two years.
17. Leonard Sweet, So Beautiful (Colorado Springs, CO: David C. Cook, 2009), p. 279, #118.
18. Ibid., p. 101.
19. Ibid., p. 256, #22.