On January 7th, Lighthouse Trails received the following email from a professor, J. Budziszewski (Boo-je-shef-skee), who was discussed in one of our 2009 articles. Professor Budziszewski has given us permission to post his email. Below his email is our response to him.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A summation of this situation is this: On April 1st, 2009, Lighthouse Trails released an article titled, “Concerned Family Asks Legitimate Questions of Church Leaders<\/a>.” The article gave the story of a family, whose son attended a Calvary Chapel high school. For a last semester assignment for graduating seniors, students were being asked to read and study a book called How to Stay Christian in College<\/em>, written by Budziszewski. The parents became concerned when they learned that Budziszewski was a Protestant turned Catholic <\/a>and one who promoted contemplative prayer practices. In our article, we showed that Professor Budziszewski was promoting <\/a>the contemplative practice of lectio divina <\/a>in a Focus on the Family column he writes for young people (see also note at bottom of this post).<\/p>\n\n\n\n The bottom line of Professor Budziszewski’s concern about our article is that we are equating contemplative spirituality with New Age, eastern-style meditation (i.e., Hinduism\/Buddhism), and he is saying that the two are not the same at all. It is for this reason that we are posting his email to us (with his permission) and also our response to him. It is our hope to help readers see that the contemplative spirituality that is being heavily promoted in the evangelical church and within Catholicism as well produces the same spiritual perception as that in New Age or Hindu\/Buddhist spirituality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Because we believe this to be true, we also believe it is completely inappropriate for a Christian high school to instruct their students using an author (in an approving manner) who not only has turned away from Protestant Christianity and gone into Catholicism but also points his readers toward contemplative prayer practices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n While it may be possible that Professor Budziszewski is not aware of the nature of contemplative spirituality, he nevertheless is<\/em> promoting it. And it is important to understand that lectio divina is an entry point into stronger forms of contemplative mystical prayer, and warning about it is completely in line with biblical injunctions about dangerous practices. Lectio divina is<\/em> a practice, which involves mantric-like repetition and focus of words and phrases (usually from the Bible) and is directly related to the contemplative spirituality of which Lighthouse Trails is opposed to. As one definition<\/a> describes the practice of lectio divina, “lectio divina begin[s] with deep, cleansing breaths and reciting a chosen phrase or word over and over to help free the mind.” In Tony Jones’ book, Divine Intervention: Encountering God Through Lectio Divina<\/em>, Jones instructs: “[R]epeat the word or phrase over and over in your mind, almost like a mantra (p. 72).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Please note that Professor Budziszewski refers to the article, “Calvary Chapel Termination Has Profound Implications,” but the actual article where we address him and his book is “Concerned Family Asks Legitimate Questions of Church Leaders.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Letter from Professor Budziszewski to Lighthouse Trails:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Your article “Calvary Chapel Termination Has Profound Implications,” posted at https:\/\/www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com\/blog\/special-report-calvary-chapel-termination-has-profound-implications\/<\/a> , contains several erroneous statements about my beliefs and teachings, which are already being quoted on other websites. In a spirit of truth, I ask you to correct them before they go viral. Here is the inaccurate paragraph:<\/p>\n\n\n\n “Recently we reported on Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa’s high school in which a teacher there asked his class to read, review, and study How to Stay Christian in College written by Protestant-turned-Catholic J. Budziszewski . The book has references in the back of some editions to mystic emergent Tony Jones, and Budziszewski himself is a proponent of contemplative prayer practices. Our article “Concerned Family Asks Legitimate Questions of Christian Leaders” illustrates what many families are going through in trying to protect their children and teens from spiritual deception. Christian parents must realize that the souls of their youth are at stake.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1. “The book has references in the back of some editions to mystic emergent Tony Jones.” I have never read the works of Mr. Jones, have no idea what they are about, and have certainly never referred to them. Authors have no control over advertisements placed in the backs of their books by the publishers. [Our note:<\/strong> In our original article, we stated the following: Lighthouse Trails quickly obtained a copy of How to Stay Christian in College<\/em>, and much to our dismay saw full page advertisements at the back of the book for books by Tony Jones<\/span><\/strong><\/a> and Eugene Peterson<\/span><\/strong><\/a>. We could understand why Budziszewski\u2019s publisher would place ads for Jones, a major advocate for mystical practices, in the back of Budziszewski\u2019s book. But we could not understand how Calvary Chapel could bring this into their school.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2. “Budziszewski himself is a proponent of contemplative prayer practices.” By “contemplation,” the author [Lighthouse Trails] means New Age mental practices, which I have consistently opposed. I have never encouraged Christians to work themselves up into altered states of consciousness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Please notice that the author[Lighthouse Trails] has not discovered anything offensive to the Gospel in the actual contents of the book. [Our note:<\/strong> In actuality, as noted in our original article, the first person Budziszewski favorably quotes in How to Stay Christian in College<\/em> <\/a>is Lutheran-turned-Catholic priest, the late Richard John Neuhaus, who many would consider a friend in the emerging church\/Catholic “conversation<\/em>.”]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Thank you,<\/p>\n\n\n\n J. Budziszewski Our response to Professor Budziszewski:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Dear Jay,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Thank you for your email sharing your concerns about our article. I do want to first point out that the article [you refer to] references our original article<\/a> regarding your book.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In answer to your concerns, when we mentioned Tony Jones’s book being offered at the back of the book, this was not to associate you with his book but rather to question why a Christian high school would give their students a book that was advertising someone teaching a spirituality that completely negates the Gospel. We put the blame of this point to the high school, not you. I do think we made that clear in the article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Secondly, we said that you are a proponent of contemplative prayer practices. We documented this in our original article with your Ask the Professor column (Focus on the Family) where you encourage the use of lectio divina<\/a>, which is a contemplative practice. By contemplative, we are referring to the spirituality that Thomas Merton, Thomas of Aquinas, Teresa of Avila, etc. would resonate with. And we actually believe that in its very essence it is the same as that of New Age or eastern-style meditation. Practicing contemplative prayer frequently leads to a panentheistic view of God, as it did with Merton, Nouwen, and many others. It is the reason that Henri Nouwen (who had been a proponent of this type of mysticism), at the end of his life, came to the conclusion that he wanted to help people find their own path to God, be it Jesus or any other (see https:\/\/www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com\/blog\/why-christian-leaders-should-not-promote-henri-nouwen\/<\/a> for citations).<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is for this reason that we do not think Christian schools should use any book whose author encourages contemplative spirituality, which you do. I do not mean to be disrespectful, but perhaps you do not understand the serious implications of the present spiritual formation movement that completely adheres to the spirituality of Thomas Merton, who stated the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n “It is a glorious destiny to be a member of the human race, … now I realize what we all are … If only they [people] could all see themselves as they really are. I suppose the big problem would be that we would bow down and worship each other…. At the center of our being is a point of nothingness which is untouched by sin and by illusion, a point of pure truth….This little point … is the pure glory of God in us. It is in everybody.” (Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander<\/em>, pp. 157-158)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Merton also told Matthew Fox <\/a>that he felt sorry for the hippies in the 60s who were dropping LSD because they could practice contemplative and get the same effect (altered states). Merton knew<\/em> it was the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We are convinced that contemplative spirituality is indeed very dangerous to the Gospel and is of the same nature as New Age or eastern-style mysticism. For example, one of the leading teachers and proponents of contemplative prayer in the world, Father Thomas Keating of Contemplative Outreach, says that many people doing contemplative prayer experience kundalini awakening.* Check out that word on the Internet for its meaning. And Richard Kirby, an Anglican mystic, said: “The meditation of advanced occultists is identical with the prayer of advanced mystics; it is no accident that both traditions use the same word for the highest reaches of their respective activities: contemplation” (samadhi in yoga).**<\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the leading teachers of contemplative prayer in Germany, Willigis Jaeger, said that the contemplative tradition is an esoteric practice on par with Zen, Yoga, and Sufism (Islamic mysticism). (from his book Search for the Meaning of Life<\/a><\/em>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n These are proponents and teachers of the practice that are saying contemplative is New Age. In essence, they would agree with us, only from the opposite perspective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Jay, we mean you no harm. This is not in any way meant to be an attack on you as a person. But we believe this mystical paradigm that has come into so much of evangelical Christianity does not line up with Scripture or the Gospel, and as believers we are compelled to defend this Gospel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In closing, I would like to add two things. First, if you would like us to post your letter to us so readers can see your side of it, we will do this. Secondly, we would like to send you a complimentary copy of A Time of Departing<\/a><\/em>, which addresses this issue, if you will allow us.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sincerely,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Lighthouse Trails editors<\/p>\n\n\n\n *<\/strong> Keating said this in the foreword of Philip St. Romain’s book, Kundalini Energy and Christian Spirituality<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n **<\/strong> Richard Kirby, The Mission of Mysticism<\/em>, p. 7.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n A final commentary by LT:<\/strong> In closing, we would like to state that “Christian” contemplation (i.e., contemplative prayer) is in nature the same as New Age or eastern-style meditation as Keating, Romain, etc. state. Therefore, it is obvious that “Christian’ contemplative is NOT Christian. An article we featured a number of years ago, written by a Hindu professor reiterates this, and it would be worthwhile to read it: “There is No Christian Yoga”<\/a> by Yogi Bama Prem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And lastly, we want to bring your attention to an article that just came out in Christianity Today<\/em>. The article, titled “Journey to the Center,”\u00a0<\/a> illustrates how dangerous\u00a0the new\u00a0mystical spirituality <\/em>really is. It features a woman, Joanna Quintrell, a formerly-traditional Christian who decided to seek out those in the New Age after “hearing” a message from God with the words: Journey Center: Christ-centered spirituality, healing, and wholeness.<\/em>\u00a0 She began attending a New Age fair and did meet a New Age woman, with whom she\u00a0formed a\u00a0friendship. As the\u00a0Christian woman continued attending the New Age fair, her\u00a0views began to change as she “found out that Jesus was already there.” Soon after,\u00a0Quintrell began a program at her church teaching contemplative prayer and spiritual formation. Eventually, she\u00a0became convinced that “Christ” was a bridge between the various spiritualities. Today, Quintrell is no longer working with\u00a0that church but helped to start a center called Journey Center<\/a>\u00a0in Santa Rosa California, which is an interfaith contemplative center that offers opportunity for many meditative practices including yoga, therapeutic touch,\u00a0and a labyrinth.\u00a0Specifically, one of those practices \u00a0is lectio divina, again making our point that lectio divina is part of this mystical realm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is sad to note that the Christianity Today<\/em> article, written by staff writer Tim Stafford, shows no negative reaction to what happened to this woman but writes in a nuetral or even affirming manner. Another example of how the new spirituality has infiltrated the evangelical church.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Note about Budziszewski and lectio divina:<\/strong> Professor Budziszewski also promotes lectio divina in his book, Ask Me Anything<\/em> (Book 2) where he tells readers that in prayer, some forms of prayer are “too limited,” and that we should draw from the “riches of Christian traditions of prayer and meditation” (p. 99). He then suggests to readers that they try Stations of the Cross<\/a> or the “spiritual exercise called lectio divina.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Professor Depts. of Government and Philosophy
University of Texas at Austin<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n\n