LTRP Note: Last week, a Lighthouse Trails reader called our office, wondering about Marcus Borg because one of her grown sons was reading Borg. This tells us that the younger generation of Christians is gleaning from the earlier writers of the emerging church. Certain leaders tried to convince the church that the emerging church had just been a fad and was dead, but we knew this wasn’t true. Last week’s phone call reminded us of this once again. Parents and grandparents, find out what books your young adult children are reading.
By Roger Oakland
Marcus Borg (d. 2015) is a former professor in Religion and Culture at Oregon State University and the author of several books, some of which are Jesus and Buddha, The God We Never Knew, and Reading the Bible Again for the First Time: Taking the Bible Seriously But not Literally. . . . [H]is thinking has greatly influenced the emerging church movement and its leaders. Brian McLaren says he has “high regard”1 for Borg; the two of them once participated in a summer seminar series at an interspiritual center in Portland, Oregon.2 Rob Bell references and praises Borg in Bell’s still-popular book Velvet Elvis.3 Walter Brueggemann, professor emeritus at Columbia Theological Seminary and one of the contributors for Richard Foster’s Renovare Spiritual Formation Study Bible, considers Borg an essential part of the emerging spirituality. Brueggemann states:
Marcus Borg is a key force in the emerging “new paradigm” of Christian faith.4
Marcus Borg and Rejection of Major Biblical Tenets
Borg explains in his book The God We Never Knew that his views on God, the Bible, and Christianity were transformed while he was in seminary:
I let go of the notion that the Bible is a divine product. I learned that it is a human cultural product, the product of two ancient communities, biblical Israel and early Christianity. As such, it contained their understandings and affirmations, not statements coming directly or somewhat directly from God. . . . I realized that whatever “divine revelation” and the “inspiration of the Bible” meant (if they meant anything), they did not mean that the Bible was a divine product with divine authority.5
This attitude would certainly explain how Borg could say:
Jesus almost certainly was not born of a virgin, did not think of himself as the Son of God, and did not see his purpose as dying for the sins of the world.6
If what Borg is saying is true, then we would have to throw out John 3:16 which says God so loved the world He gave His only Son, and we would have to dismiss the theme of a blood offering that is prevalent throughout all of Scripture. In the Old Testament, it is clear:
For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul. (Leviticus 17:11)
But Borg rejects this emphasis:
To think that the central meaning of Easter [resurrection] depends upon something spectacular happening to Jesus’ corpse misses the point of the Easter message and risks trivializing the story. To link Easter primarily to our hope for an afterlife, as if our post-death existence depends upon God having transformed the corpse of Jesus, is to reduce the story to a politically-domesticated yearning for our survival beyond death.7
What is behind this mindset of Borg’s? Listen to one New Ager describe what underlies this line of thought:
Jesus was an historical person, a human becoming Christ, the Christos, is an eternal transpersonal condition of being. Jesus did not say that this higher state of consciousness realized in him was his alone for all time. Nor did he call us to worship him. Rather, he called us to follow him, to follow in his steps, to learn from him, from his example.8
Marcus Borg and Mystical Prayer
Marcus Borg is also someone who resonates with mystical spirituality understands the popularity of mystical prayer. He states:
In some mainline denominations, emerging-paradigm [contemplative] Christians are in the majority. Others are about equally divided between these two ways of being Christian.9
Borg also speaks of “thin places.” One commentator discusses Borg’s ideas on this:
In The Heart of Christianity, Borg writes of “thin places,” places where, to use Eliade’s terminology, the division between the sacred and the profane becomes thin. Borg writes that he owes this metaphor of “thin places” to Celtic Christianity and the recent recovery of Celtic spirituality . . . his understanding of “thin places” is deeply connected to his panentheism, his articulation of God as “the More,” and his—like Eliade—division of the world into layers of reality.10
Borg says these thin places (reached through meditation) are “[d]eeply rooted in the Bible and the Christian tradition,”11 but he, like others, is unable to show biblical evidence that God mandates meditation. Thin places imply that God is in all things, and the gap between God, evil, man, everything thins out and ultimately disappears in meditation:
God is a nonmaterial layer of reality all around us, “right here” as well as “more than right here.” This way of thinking thus affirms that there are minimally two layers or dimensions of reality, the visible world of our ordinary experience and God, the sacred, Spirit.12
Endnotes:
1. Statement by Brian McLaren on McLaren’s website: http://www.brianmclaren.net:80/archives/000201.html, “What about other websites?”
2. The Center for Spiritual Development, 2006 Summer Seminar called “The Church in the 21st Century” where Brian McLaren and Marcus Borg were two of the speakers, http://www.center-for-spiritual-develop ment.org/DVDCatalog.html.
3. Rob Bell, Velvet Elvis (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2005), pp. 180, 184.
4. https://www.harpercollins.com/9780062269973/convictions
5. Marcus Borg, The God We Never Knew (New York, NY: HarperCollins, First HarperCollins Paperback Edition, 1998), p. 25.
6. Ibid.
7. Marcus Borg, “Easter About Life, Not Death” (Washington Post/Newsweek “On Faith” column, April 7, 2004, http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/marcus_borg/2007/04/easter_not_about_death_but_lif.html).
8. John White, (Science of Mind, September 1981), p. 15.
9. Marcus Borg, The Heart of Christianity (San Francisco, CA: Harper, 2004), p. 7.
10. Chris Baker, “A Positive Articulation of Marcus Borg’s Theology” (Sandlestraps Sanctuary blog, April 5, 2007, http://sandalstraps.blog spot.com/2007/04/positive-articulation-of-marcus-borgs_05.html.
11. Marcus Borg, The Heart of Christianity (New York, NY: HarperCollins, First HarperCollins Paperback Edition, 2004), p. 155.
12. Ibid.
(The above are combined extracts from Roger Oakland’s book, Faith Undone.)
Floyd
Great for you. God is so good. He showed you the world that came from is not of the spirit of Christ.
CW
Ron, thank you for bringing up that issue. Not many Christians I know personally seem to understand it. Our children were given Star Wars toys when they were young, and shortly afterward demonic things began happening in our home. An 8-year-old son was actually the first one to notice. We prayed about it, dear husband burned the toys (with our children’s full consent) and prayed over our home, and the demonic activity ceased.
Ron DeMitchell
I should wonder if movies that promote witchcraft, like the Star Wars saga, had any influence on this man’s thinking in any wayas well. The Jedi are told to be mindful of the force. It reminds me of when Obi-Wan says to Anican, “Only a sith deals in absolutes.” (Revenge of the Sith). I would have to assume that these guys no longer believe in absolute truth–even if they did at one time. Would they endorse this so-called contemplative spirituality if they were committed to absolute truth? I highly doubt it.
CW
As I understand it, Borg also denied the physical resurrection of Christ Jesus the Messiah. His unscriptural beliefs, quoted in the article above, can easily be refuted with scriptures in the Bible. When I saw that he had participated in the “Jesus” Seminar — which denied much of Scripture and promoted belief in “another Jesus”, not the one who came from Heaven to reveal the love, truth, and power of His Father — I knew that reading/studying his books could not be a good thing.
Lydia
I am so tired of these self proclaimed ‘experts’ coming along and asserting that all of the main tenets of the faith are not true! YES, they ARE true, all of them! These evil wolves are all wrong and they are antichrists leading the church astray. Yet you would have to be pretty apostate yourself already to even give them one inch of credence, or right at the precipice of apostasy. No, the emergent church apostasy is alive and well. It just is better disguised. Now they are pretty much all in that titannic. The best way to find out what your kids believe is to ask them direct questions. If there is something amiss, just pry deeper and ask if they read any books by anyone that changed their mind and see where the popcorn trail leads. Sometimes it is a needle in a haystack to chase down all the new false teachers, but if you nip the heresies in the bud with the truth of the Bible, you will refute the errors well. We all must learn to take up the sword of the Word of God and wield it with skill!
Joey W-D
David Dean, that is just one of the saddest things that I am hearing from all over the world. What people once fought to preserve have now caved into the pressure and joined the heresey train and are riding free and happy down the wide road to destruction. Thank you very much for your opinion on the Borg article. It is nice to hear of someone whom actually attended that Seminary and knew what they taught back then. Makes this article written today carry the weight it needs to wake hopefully many up to what is taking place and they will get off the wide road to destruction and take the Narrow Way to home.
David Dean
I attended Lincoln Christian Seminary [now known as Lincoln Christian University] from Fall 1998 – Spring 2001. Back then, the class in Christology used a textbook by Millard Erickson to refute and debunk the heresies of Borg, John Dominic Crossan, and the rest of the Jesus Seminar. Now the texts used in that institution promote the very heresies of the Jesus Seminar they once fought.