Lighthouse Trails Responds to Why We Include Secular News Stories |
 Over the past year or two, we have received some letters and comments, asking why we post articles by secular news groups, particularly The Epoch Times. Most of these letters and comments have been written graciously, but a few have suggested that Lighthouse Trails must not be a true discernment ministry if we are posting such stories. We have prayerfully and carefully put together a response regarding this issue.
Response to Why We Include Secular News Stories
Lighthouse Trails is a research ministry, and we do post news articles from various secular and Christian sources if we believe our readers can benefit from the information. We know that the founders of The Epoch Times are part of a religious movement called Falun Gong. We also know that a majority of Christian and religious media outlets these days and most other non-Christian/secular outlets have equally wrong issues that would forbid us from posting any news stories from any news source. (The fact is, we worry more about posting stories from some of the Christian sources than we do the secular because with the secular, readers are aware a story is secular and thus requires discernment; but with Christian-based ones, it’s easy for readers to think it must be ok since it is “Christian.”) We prayerfully have made the decision that when it comes to out-of-house news stories (not talking about theological, discernment, or doctrinal issues), we would post certain ones where the information would be helpful for our readers to have. If we drop The Epoch Times because they are founded by non-Christians, we would have to drop just about every single news story we post. We have always tried to make sure we put a separation of some kind between such news stories and articles and commentaries we post by trusted authors and writers.
But, as we explained, we are a research ministry, and part of that does include what is going on in the culture and the world. Because there are secular, political, medical, science-related, and so forth issues that do affect all people, including Christians, it is our belief that we, as believers, should have some awareness of these non-church issues. And the apostle Paul does remind us not to be ignorant of Satan’s devices (2 Corinthians 2:11).
We also know that many Christians are dependent on biased inaccurate mainstream media sources for their daily news of what’s going on in the world. In fact, that is what the masses of people are doing. We are attempting to provide some news that is non-mainstream as an alternative source. Some may say we should just write those stories ourselves, but that would not be possible on a regular basis as we do not have that kind of manpower.
We hope this helps explain why we do post news stories from The Epoch Times and other non-Christian sources. We would like to add this that we do not post these without any discretion; for example, we look for news stories that do not use what’s called yellow journalism or are extremely biased. All news stories and articles, no matter what the source, have a certain level of bias because they are written from the viewpoint of the author or reporter, but even then, an article or news story should contain true (and hopefully documented) information.
We know not every one of our readers will agree with us on this position we hold. We’ve also had readers question our use of PayPal or Amazon because of their support for Planned Parenthood and the LGBTQ agenda. However, we once came upon a couple lists of all the companies that support one or both of those, and it included Microsoft, Apple, AT&T, Verizon, Google, Mastercard, Krogers, Levi, and dozens of other large corporations and companies including credit card companies, fuel companies, airlines, and grocery stores. One would have to never use computers, e-mail, land lines, cell phones, the Internet, or many large outlet stores and would have to limit travel and basic spending. And even our property taxes largely go to a currently very corrupt and evil public school system.
In the World, But Not of the World
So the question every believer must ask is “how do I live in the world, but not of the world.?” We don’t claim to have the answer to that question perfected at Lighthouse Trails, by any means, but it is something we are always striving to do in a way that would be pleasing to the Lord. We know we fall short of perfection every day, but we do try.
Many know the story in the Bible where Jesus was asked about paying tribute (taxes), and He told them to bring him a penny and said give to Caesar what is Caesar’s (Mark 12:14-17). We realize that is not the same as our using secular articles to give news to our readers, but some could have easily accused Jesus of showing support to an evil government by doing that. But, of course, He was not doing that at all, but it was an example of showing a separation between the world’s Kingdom and God’s Kingdom yet acknowledging that we do live in the world.
Likewise, in 1 Corinthians 5:9-13, Paul describes how, if we were to disassociate ourselves from the world, we would need to “go out of the world” (v. 10); at the same time, he says that we are not called to judge the world (for “God judgeth” it) but we are to “judge them that are within [the church] (v. 12).
We realize these two examples do not exactly coincide with our situation regarding using secular news stories, but it does provide us with some insights into living in this world yet still maintaining biblical integrity, which has always been the desire and effort of Lighthouse Trails.
Added Note: We have always hoped, at Lighthouse Trails, that if there was one thing we encouraged Christians to do is to be discerning, whether they are reading us or another source – be it secular or Christian. Diet Eman, the author of Things We Couldn’t Say and a Christian resistance worker in Holland during the Holocaust years, said that one of the reasons the Germans were so duped by Hilter was because they did not, overall, think for themselves. She said Hollanders weren’t like that, that they were basically independent thinkers, and there were quite a few resisters there who helped to save the lives of persecuted Jews. That is what Christians need to be – independent thinkers – and part of that is to use discernment and not leave it up to others to do the thinking for them. God blessed humanity with the ability to think and reason intelligently. So whatever is being read or watched, we must not take off our thinking caps. We trust that when Lighthouse Trails readers are reading secular news on our site, they are using the God-given ability to be discerning. The reason today’s Christianity has so many misguiding and followed “heroes” (e.g., Beth Moore, Rick Warren, Sarah Young, etc.) is because there are so many Christians who would rather follow someone rather than think for themselves, reason things out, and pray for godly wisdom. But the Lord promises to guide us and protect us from deception if we have a love for the truth and are willing to be used by Him.
(photo from istockphoto.com; used with permission)
|
If Persecution Comes, Are Western Christians Ready? |
 A photo of Georgi Vins in 1977 at the Yakutsk prison camp.
For nearly ten years now, Lighthouse Trails has been publishing the works of Georgi Vins, the Baptist pastor who was persecuted under the former U.S.S.R., (spending a total of eight years in the communist prisons). To date, we have obtained the rights and published three of his books that had gone out of print: The Gospel in Bonds, Moscow Express, and most recently Three Generations of Suffering.
Below is an extract of one of the chapters from that last book, which is a portrayal of one of the men Georgi knew, who too was persecuted and imprisoned. It is our hope that as our readers learn about believers from the past who paid a dear price for serving the Lord in countries that forbid it that we ourselves will be strengthened in our faith, no matter what the future holds.
The Story of Georgi Ivanovich Shipkov
By Georgi Vins
From Three Generations of Suffering
Georgi Ivanovich Shipkov was called to be the exegete of our brotherhood. His spiritual articles were printed in many Evangelical Christian-Baptist journals. They were written in beautiful literary language and with deep reverence for the Person of the Savior. Even today, for the Russian brotherhood, they are a model of profound Russian thought in the study of the Book of Books.
In the journal The Baptist, No. 1, 1927, was printed Georgi Shipkov’s biography, written by Pavel Ivanov-Klyshnikov. I quote it here with a small abbreviation:
Georgi Ivanovich Shipkov was born on October 25th, 1865, near Samara. His father was a peasant, a member of the Molokan sect. Georgi received a strict religious education in his family. In 1878, the Shipkovs moved to Blagoveshchensk. Georgi, by then a young man, showed an intense love for reading and the study of languages. Having passed the examination for several classes of high school as an external student, he entered a postal-telegraph office as a clerk and continued studying languages and reading, being chiefly interested in history and philosophy. In 1889, Georgi Shipkov turned to the Lord. From that time, he began to be interested in literature on theological questions and read all the books in this field which could be obtained in Blagoveshchenk, in English, French, and German as well as Russian. In order to obtain a systematic theological education, in 1894, Shipkov entered the theological faculty of the American University in Peking where he received the degree of Doctor of Theology in 1898 and immediately returned to Blagoveshehenak. Here he went to work at the telegraph office once more and served there until 1921. As well as this, he was for eight years a lecturer in English in a technical high school and a polytechnic. This work earned brother Georgi the means to live, and at the same time, he undertook spiritual ministry; for about thirteen years, he was deputy pastor of the Blagoveshchensk Baptist community; for seven years, he was a teacher there; for six years, he was Chairman of the Far East Branch of the All-Russian Baptist Union; and for six years, Comrade Chairman of this Branch, which was subsequently re-named the Far East Baptist Union.
In 1928, Georgi Shipkov, as the delegate of the Far East brotherhood, took part in the work of the Fourth Baptist Congress in Toronto.
Shipkov lived almost all his life in Blagoveshchensk and worked zealously for about fifty years in the local church, which was the mother of all the communities of the Far East Evangelical Christian-Baptist brotherhood.
In 1930, as a consequence of the arrest of my father, Peter Vins, who served as pastor of the Blagoveshchensk church from 1927-1930, Georgi Shipkov once more took upon himself a responsible ministry as pastor, which lasted until 1937.
These years were especially hard for our whole brotherhood. The prayer-house in Blagoveshchensk, built by the believers’ own hands as long ago as 1910, was confiscated in 1930, and many preachers of the Gospel were forced into exile or were locked up in prisons. Georgi Shipkov was almost the only one left of the ministers of the church in Blagoveshchensk.
Under the influence of persecution in these years, there began to appear among the believers those who were fainthearted, fearful, and even time servers. Fallen and broken officers of the church emerged, and it was from these that the authorities began in subsequent years to form religious groupings obedient to atheism.
The majority of believers, however, courageously continued to serve God.
In 1938, Georgi Shipkov was sent [in excile] to Omsk. He settled down in a small room in a house belonging to believers. He was physically very weak. But the secret police did not leave him in peace: they often summoned him to interrogations and threatened him with a new exile even farther to the north, in the tundra.
I saw Georgi Shipkov once in Omsk in 1939. He was a short, thin old man with a pointed beard, very affectionate and kind, who laid his small hand on my head and asked about my father.
In the last years of his life (1934-1939), Georgi Shipkov did a great deal of work on the interpretation of the New Testament. His work was contained in a large manuscript book. Unfortunately, the fate of this material is unknown. Perhaps it is intact and is lying around somewhere unused? Perhaps believers are preserving letters, articles, and other manuscript legacies of dear Georgi Shipkov? I beg the Lord to rouse the hearts of believers to seek out the precious spiritual heritage of our heroes of the faith so that it may become the property of our whole Evangelical-Baptist brotherhood.
As an aged man, committed to the Lord to the end, Shipkov ended his earthly journey in prison.
From 1934-1935, there was a lively correspondence between my father and Georgi Shipkov. Unfortunately, only a small number of Shipkov’s letters have been preserved. Four of his letters are included in the present collection: a letter to my father from the Blagoveshchensk church (written by Shipkov at the commission of the church), and three personal letters from Shipkov (only a small part of the third letter has been preserved).
[Below is a fragment of one of the letters written by Shipkov to Peter Vins.]
People are bitterly disillusioned about swift help from God and usually first fall into despair and then into godlessness. In this way, their faith, like a spark from a crucible, first of all soars gleaming upward to the heavens, then is extinguished in the night air and falls as a speck of dust to the cold earth. Alas for such “believers”!
This is not the kind of faith in God and the kind of hope in His all-powerfulness and mercy that true Christians and reborn children of God should have. The central pillar in the church of God’s grace looks on the trial of believers by afflictions as a purifying fire, melting gold to give it greater value (1 Peter 1:3-7). Gold in the smelting furnace is not destroyed but is purified and gains in value. True faith is subject to the same process and attains the same result in the crucible of trial by afflictions. Another pillar of the same church orders believers to have not a simple but a great joy when they fall into many various trials, for the testing of their faith, leading to an increase of steadfastness, which has its full effect on those who are tried (James 1:2-4). And finally, the third pillar of the Gentile section of the same church reasons that the gift of God we have received, Faith, with its accompanying afflictions, evolves, not decreasing, but increasing in new experiences and raising itself by degrees higher and higher to the faultless sensation of the love of God, poured out in the hearts of believers by the Holy Spirit given to them in the day they turn to the Lord (Romans 5:1-5). On the basis of such an experience, the apostle asks: “Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?” (Romans 8:35). And at once, he answers with complete conviction:
I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels [fallen], nor principalities [those in command], nor powers [authorities], nor things present, nor things to come, nor height [worldly position], nor depth [humiliation in the world], nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Romans 8:38-39)
From the very beginning of Christianity, to us believers “it is given in the behalf of Christ, not only to believe on him, but also to suffer for his sake” (Philippians 1:29). His redemptive sufferings for believers must necessarily be compensated for by their sufferings in thanks to Him.
|
“H2O, Not CO2 May Be Driving Summer Heat Wave” Says Studies |
LTRP Note: The following article is posted for informational and research purposes. (Photo: Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai volcano eruption in 2022; from 2-second clip of YouTube video; used in accordance with the US Fair Use Act)
By James Murphy
The New American
Lost in all the hysterical proclamations of “historic” summer heat waves and “hottest day ever” proclamations this summer is a theory that H2O, not CO2 and other trace atmospheric gases, may be driving hotter-than-normal temperatures. Both NASA and the European Space Agency seemingly endorse the notion that a gigantic undersea volcano that erupted from December 2021 until mid-January 2022 may have spurred a dramatic increase in water vapor — the Earth’s main greenhouse gas — contributing to higher air temperatures this year.
When the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai volcano erupted, it reportedly spewed a stupendous amount of H2O as water vapor into the atmosphere, enough, it is said, to have filled no less than 58,000 Olympic-size swimming pools.
“The violent Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai eruption on 15 January 2022 not only injected ash into the stratosphere but also large amounts of water vapor, breaking all records for direct injection of water vapor, by a volcano or otherwise, in the satellite era,” a study published in Geophysical Research Letters reported. Click here to continue reading.
Related Information:
“We Are Totally Awash in Pseudoscience”: Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist on Climate Agenda
A Christian Perspective on the Environment by Roger Oakland
Global Warming or Cooling or an End-Time Sign? by Tony Pearce
Earth Day and a Total Transformation for a Post-Christian World by Carl Teichrib
|
“US Pediatricians ‘Reaffirm’ Child Gender Transition Policy as Europe Sounds Alarm” |
LTRP Note: The following news story is posted for informational and research purposes.
By Breccan F. Thies
Washington Examiner
The American Academy of Pediatrics decided to “reaffirm” its stance on pushing child gender transition operations but ordered a “systematic review” amid a growing number of states outlawing the practice.
The AAP’s Aug. 4 decision to “reaffirm” its green light for child gender transition procedures is under the microscope as more than 20 states have outlawed the practice and European doctors have taken the opposite approach.
The AAP also appears confident the review will justify its current position on allowing children to pursue genital mutilation and chemical castration, with CEO and Executive Vice President Mark Del Monte saying part of the group’s “mission” is to “ensure young people get the reproductive and gender-affirming care they need.” Click here to continue reading.
Related Articles:
“U.S. Is ‘Most Permissive Country’ When It Comes to Transgender Treatments, Study Shows”
“Transgender Madness: One Man’s Fight to Save His Daughter”
Booklet: Transgenderism and Our Children
Image by R O from Pixabay
|
Letter to the Editor: A Time of Departing Transformed My Friend’s Life! |
Dear Lighthouse Trails:
Thanks again for all your effort and time that you put into this; it is greatly appreciated by many of us. There was a friend in our Bible study who was very much connected with contemplative spirituality and New Age. I gave her a copy of A Time of Departing for her consideration, and God used it to transform her life. Within a month she had cleared out 1/2 dozen contemplative/New Age books from her library, and three months later she purged them all, which were numerous, as she is an avid reader. She was set free and is now blessed with a real personal and close relationship with Jesus as she spends much more time in God’s Word. She was careful not to merely share these books with others, but rather destroyed them all, because she did not want anyone else to read them.
Marty B.
LT Editor’s Response: Thank you so much for sharing that testimonial. We wish Ray Yungen were here to read it. It’s one of the most meaningful stories we’ve heard. It’s very touching in two respects: first, that you were willing to take the risk and give her the book, not knowing what her reaction would be (she could have become angry), and second, that your friend loved truth so much that she was willing to take those steps to change the path she was on. Again, thank you for sharing this.
To our readers: If you know of someone who is involved with the teachings and/or practices of contemplative prayer (i.e., spiritual formation) and would like to give that person a copy of A Time of Departing, we are happy to send you a free copy that you can share (or we can send it directly to the person if you prefer). Also, if your pastor is quoting from the contemplative mystics (e.g., Richard Foster, Henri Nouwen, Eugene Peterson, Thomas Merton, and so many more) and you would like to give him a copy, you may request a free copy for him as well. Because of the detrimental effects of gleaning from the mystics and practicing contemplative prayer, this is a serious matter that has saturated the church, but still so few pastors and leaders address it. For the free copy, write to us at editors@lighthousetrails.com. For those who wish to purchase a copy, click here.
|
Letter to the Editor From Two Women: What Are We Doing Wrong? |
Dear Lighthouse Trails:
This note is actually from two people—my friend Elizabeth and myself (Ann). Judy and I have known one another for 12 years—we met at a Bible study in my home. She still lives in ___________ and I’m now in ________, and we meet once a week for a Zoom prayer. Even though there is a large age disparity—Elizabeth is 44, and I am 81—we are like-minded sisters in Christ.
Our question is this: Over the last several years, we have contacted pastors whose churches we attended—or—pastors who came to our attention, who were involved in contemplative, New Age, spiritual Formation, etc. When we spoke to our own pastors and provided them with links from Lighthouse Trails in an honest attempt to warn them about a particular teaching they were promoting, we never received ANY response from them, not even a “thank you but get lost”! We are always dismissed out of hand and actually ignored. It just appears to be rude and not becoming to men who lead a church.
Specific examples: this is from Elizabeth:
My own search for a church has been fruitless. I have sought several in the area and they’re either compromised by affiliations or their Statement of Faith is promoting false doctrines, or the women teach Bible studies from untrustworthy books. I reached out to the pastors of these churches with my questions and concerns, but I never get a response. The church I was attending had solid teaching until a charismatic couple began attending and then taking the place as elders and influencing the pastor. He started teaching about “binding and loosing” and promoting shows like The Chosen, whereas he had always been discerning with solid teaching before. When I sent information from Lighthouse Trails with my concerns to him, I never received a response.
And this is my example (Ann):
I have been attending a church here in _________ for 2.5 years. The preaching is quite solid; however, much to my dismay, the church library which is in plain sight (it is situated off the large entrance, leading to the sanctuary) openly displays books by Francis Chan, Matt Chandler, Tim Keller, John Piper, etc. I sent the pastor a note and links from LT about these books/authors and my concerns. I believe it has the propensity to be confusing to young Christians or those with little or no discernment, since what those books teach are diametrically opposite to the messages from the pulpit. Therefore, I don’t understand the need to offer them. When, like Elizabeth, I explained my concern and included Lighthouse Trails links, I was totally ignored. I never heard from him, and I know he avoids me when I am at church and he sees me. And the books remain a year later.
And while visiting my son in another state recently, my son mentioned a new church had been started there. I was curious so I looked it up online. In the young pastor’s bio, he proudly mentions his involvement with Spiritual Formation, how he taught it in a seminary setting and now is using it in this new church. I really believe he is totally naive about what it is and has no clue how dangerous it is. Pastors are warned they will be held to a stricter account for what they teach others. So I sent him a short e-mail, explained I was just visiting, told him my age and when I had been saved and asked him if he would please read the link (from LT) on Spiritual Formation and explained my sincere concern for him. Again, no response.
In all these instances, we get the impression these men must look down their noses at discernment sites, no matter how accurate and truthful and even though videos, links, other sources, ibids, etc are provided showing the veracity and truth of the information.
So what are we doing wrong? Should we not say anything? Is it wrong to contact a pastor you do not know but who really appears to have a need to be warned? We don’t do this willy nilly; we do it reluctantly! We have learned from experience that discerning is a very difficult gift and frankly, the church doesn’t seem to like those who have it and (attempt) to apply it.
What counsel can you give us? It is very discouraging. I would be happy to send you the actual emails/letters so as you can see for yourself what was written had been presented in a kind and loving way. And it’s not even that we need an acknowledgement, but it seems so odd that NONE of these pastors got in touch with us, .and the above is only a few examples. There are other examples which we have not detailed.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth and Ann
LTRP Response to Elizabeth and Ann:
Hello,
We first want to say that we very much understand the discouragement that you both are going through because we have gone through it many times ourselves. For example, after 21 years of trying to warn the church, pastors, and leaders about the contemplative prayer movement (via Spiritual Formation), the issue still has not come to the table and is basically ignored by the majority of church leaders and pastors as if it isn’t even an issue. They just don’t talk about it.
For us, we had to come to the realization a long time ago that we could not look at the fruit of our labors but were supposed to do what we believe the Lord has called us to do and leave the results up to Him. We have been reminded often that we are not the Holy Spirit who is the One who convicts of sin. It is up to us to try to be faithful (by His grace and strength) in doing what He has called us to do. That doesn’t mean we don’t get disheartened because we do, but we pick ourselves up from those times of discouragement and keep going.
On a practical level, we have come to believe that giving someone one of the booklets is usually more effective (particularly for a skeptic) than sending website links and e-mails. The booklets are short, concise, and have all the documentation; plus a pastor can take it home from the office, away from his computer and people and read it. No doubt, many of the booklets have been thrown away too, but the professional presentation of the booklet format does draw attention. Whereas one might forget about an e-mail with links, it will be harder to forget about an actual hard copy booklet. And we think you know us well enough that we don’t say that just to sell more booklets. We’ve given away countless numbers of them, and we have never done this for the money. That’s why we sell the booklets at such low prices. And that’s why we do the free pastors’ booklet mailings 3x a year. That list is up to over 1000 names now. We can’t tell you if they are making a difference or not. As we said, we decided a long time ago we could not worry about the results. If we had done that, very likely, we would have quit years ago from discouragement.
So please don’t give up. Maybe those who you have attempted to reach have ignored you (or maybe they just didn’t answer out of sheer busyness), but that part is up to the Lord. We’ve often thought about what Jesus said when one of the disciples asked, “what about John,” and He answered basically, you just do what you are supposed to do and never mind the rest. Remembering His response has helped us over the years.
Being a discerning Christian is a very lonely road, as you two have experienced. But if you think of the history of Christianity, that is generally how it is. Persecuted, rejected, misunderstood, and ignored.
In closing, we have to remember (as we know you do) that we are living in a time of great deception. The Bible tells us things are going to get worse, and there will be “seducing spirits” that will delude those who don’t have a love for the truth. What most Christians don’t realize is that as they play around with occultic practices (Yoga, contemplative, centering prayer, enneagram, labyrinth, lectio divina, etc), they are walking into a spiritual trap, for, as Ray Yungen often said, it is this occultism that is the vehicle which will deceive the multitudes. We are watching this take place around the world before our very eyes—both by Christians and non-believers.
We would like to say this thought too: if you two would like, let us put those pastors names on our list. They won’t know who added their names, and they will get booklets three times a year from us. If you would like us to add some names, just e-mail them to us at editors@lighthousetrails.com [and that goes for anyone reading this post too]. Our next pastors’ mailing will be in mid-to-late September. And then one more at the end of the year.
Blessings to you both, and keep up the good work! What you are doing is true devotion and love for others.
The Editors at Lighthouse Trails
(photo is a stock image from istockphoto.com; used with permission)
|
NEW BOOKLET: What a Sovereign God Cannot Do (And How the Calvinist View Just Doesn’t Work) |
What a Sovereign God Cannot Do (And How the Calvinist View Just Doesn’t Work) by Dave Hunt is our newest Lighthouse Trails Booklet. The booklet is 10 pages long and sells for $1.95 for single copies. Quantity discounts are available. Our booklets are designed to give away to others or for your own personal use. Below is the content of this new booklet. To order copies of What a Sovereign God Cannot Do, click here.
What a Sovereign God Cannot Do (And How the Calvinist View Just Doesn’t Work)
By Dave Hunt
No One Can Resist God’s Will?
One of the most common expressions one hears in Christian circles, especially for reassurance when things aren’t going well, is that “God is in control; He’s still on the throne.” Christians comfort themselves with these words—but what do they mean? Was God not “in control” when Satan rebelled and when Adam and Eve disobeyed, but now He is? Does God’s being in control mean that all the rape, murder, war, and multiplied evil is exactly what He planned and desires?
Christ asks us to pray, “Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven” (Matthew 6:10). Why that prayer if we are already in God’s kingdom with Satan bound as John Calvin taught and Reconstructionists claim today? Could a world of rampant evil really be what God wills? Surely not!
“Wait a minute!” someone counters. “Are you suggesting that our omnipotent God is unable to effect His will upon Earth? What heresy is this! Paul clearly says that God ‘worketh all things after the counsel of his own will’ (Ephesians 1:11).”
Yes. But the Bible itself contains many examples of men defying God’s will and disobeying Him. God laments, “I have nourished and brought up children, and they have rebelled against me” (Isaiah1:2). The sacrifices they offer Him and their evil lives are obviously not according to His will. We are told that “the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the counsel of God against themselves” (Luke 7:30). Christ’s statement in Matthew 7:21 shows clearly that everyone doesn’t always do God’s will: “Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.” That is implied also in Isaiah 65:12; 1 Thessalonians 5:17-19; Hebrews 10:36; 1 Peter 2:15; 1 John 2:17; and many other Scriptures. In fact, Ephesians 1:11 doesn’t say that everything that happens is according to God’s will, but according to “the counsel” of His will. Clearly, the counsel of God’s will has given man freedom to disobey Him. There is no other explanation for sin.
Yet, in his zeal to protect God’s sovereignty from any challenge, Calvinist teacher A. W. Pink argues earnestly, “God foreordains everything which comes to pass. . . . God initiates all things, regulates all things.”1* Calvinist theologian Edwin H. Palmer** agrees:
God is in back of everything. He decides and causes all things to happen that do happen. . . . He has foreordained everything “after the counsel of his own will” (Ephesians:1:11): the moving of a finger . . . the mistake of a typist—even sin.2
Right here we confront a vital distinction. It is one thing for God, in His sovereignty and without diminishing that sovereignty, to give man the power to rebel against Him. This would open the door for sin as solely man’s responsibility by a free choice. It is something entirely different for God to control everything to such an extent that He must effectively cause man to sin.
It is a fallacy to imagine that for God to be in control of His universe, He must therefore foreordain and initiate everything—thus, He causes sin, then punishes the sinner. To justify this view, it is argued that “God is under no obligation to extend His grace to those whom He predestines to eternal judgment.”3 In fact, however, obligation has no relationship to grace.
Is God’s Sovereignty Diminished?
However, it actually diminishes God’s sovereignty to suggest that He cannot use to His own purposes what He doesn’t foreordain and originate. There is neither logical nor biblical reason why a sovereign God by His own sovereign design could not allow creatures made in His image the freedom of genuine moral choice. And there are compelling reasons why He would do so.
Many an atheist (or sincere seeker who is troubled by evil and suffering) angrily declares, “You claim your God is all-powerful. Then why doesn’t He stop evil and suffering? If He could and doesn’t, He’s a monster; if He can’t, then He isn’t all-powerful!” The atheist thinks he has us cornered.
The answer involves certain things which God cannot do.
But God is infinite in power, so there must be nothing He can’t do! Really? The very fact that He is infinite in power means He cannot fail. There is much else which finite beings do all the time but which the infinite, absolutely sovereign God cannot do because He is God: lie, cheat, steal, sin, be mistaken, etc. In fact, much else that God cannot do is vital for us to understand in meeting challenges from skeptics.
Tragically, there are many sincere questions that most Christians can’t answer. Few parents have taken the time to think through the many intellectual and theological challenges their children increasingly face, challenges for which today’s youth find no answers from so many pulpits and Sunday-school lessons. As a result, growing numbers of those raised in evangelical homes and churches are abandoning the “faith” they never adequately understood.
Is sovereignty and power the cure-all? Many Christians superficially think so. Yet, there is much for which sovereignty and power are irrelevant. God acts not only sovereignly, but in love, grace, mercy, kindness, justice, and truth. His sovereignty is exercised only in perfect harmony with all of His other attributes.
There is much that God cannot do, not in spite of who He is, but because of who He is. Even Augustine, described as the first of the early so-called Church Fathers who “taught the absolute sovereignty of God”4 declared, “Wherefore, He cannot do some things for the very reason that He is omnipotent.”5
Because of His absolute holiness, it is impossible for God to do evil, to cause others to do evil or even to entice anyone into evil:
Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted . . .neither tempteth he any man. (James 1:13)
But what about the many places in Scripture where it says God tempted someone or was tempted? For example, “God did tempt Abraham” (Genesis:22:1). The Hebrew word there and throughout the Old Testament is nacah, which means to test or prove as in assaying the purity of a metal. It has nothing to do with tempting to sin. God was testing Abraham’s faith and obedience.
Can God Be Tempted?
If God Himself cannot be tempted, why is Israel warned, “Ye shall not tempt the Lord your God” (Deuteronomy 6:16)? We are even told that at Massah, in demanding water, “they tempted the Lord, saying, Is the Lord among us, or not?” (Exodus:17:7). Later they “tempted God in their heart by asking meat for their lust . . .[saying,] Can God furnish a table in the wilderness? Yea . . . [they] provoked the most high . . . ” (Psalm:78:18-19, 41, 56).
God was not being tempted to do evil! He was being provoked; thus, His patience was being tested. Instead of waiting upon Him obediently to meet their needs, His people were demanding that He use His power to give them what they wanted to satisfy their lusts. Their “temptation” of God was a blasphemous challenge forcing Him either to give in to their desire or to punish them for rebellion.
When Jesus was “tempted of the devil” to cast Himself from the pinnacle of the temple to prove the promise that angels would bear Him up in their hands, He quoted, “Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God” (Matthew 4:7). In other words, to put ourselves deliberately in a place where God must act to protect us is tempting Him.
James goes on to say, “But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust and enticed.” Temptation to evil does not come from without but from within. The man who could not possibly be “tempted” to be dishonest in business may succumb to the temptation to commit adultery and thus be dishonest with his wife. It is said that “every man has his price.”
God was not tempting Adam and Eve to sin when He told them not to eat of a particular tree. They were tempted by their own lust and selfish desire. Even in innocence, man could be selfish and disobedient. We see this in young infants who as yet presumably don’t know the difference between right and wrong.
A Penalty That Had to Be Paid
Additionally, there are a number of other things which God cannot do. God cannot deny Himself or contradict Himself. He cannot change. He cannot go back on His Word. Specifically in relationship to mankind, there are some things God cannot do which are very important to understand and to explain to others. One of the most fundamental concepts (and least understood by “religious” people) is this: He cannot forgive sin without the penalty being paid and accepted by man.
Are we saying that in spite of His sovereignty and infinite power, God cannot forgive whomever He wills, He cannot simply wipe their slate clean in the heavenly record? Exactly: He cannot, because He is also perfectly just. “So are you suggesting,” some complain, “that God wants to save all mankind but lacks the power to do so? It is a denial of God’s omnipotence and sovereignty if there is anything He desires but can’t accomplish.” In fact, omnipotence and sovereignty are irrelevant with regard to forgiveness.
Christ in the Garden the night before the Cross cried out, “O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me ” (Matthew 26:39). Surely, if it had been possible to provide salvation any other way, the Father would have allowed Christ to escape the excruciating physical sufferings of the Cross and the infinite spiritual agony of enduring the penalty His perfect justice had pronounced upon sin. But even for the omnipotent God, there was no other way. It is important that we clearly explain this biblical and logical truth when we present the Gospel.
Suppose a judge has before him his own son, daughter, or other loved one found guilty of multiple murders by the jury. In spite of his love, the judge must uphold the penalty demanded by the law. Love cannot nullify justice. The only way God could forgive sinners and remain just would be for Christ to pay the penalty for sin (see Romans 3:21-28).
Can God Force Love?
There are two other matters of vital importance in relation to man’s salvation which God cannot do: He cannot force anyone to love Him; and He cannot force anyone to accept a gift. By the very nature of love and giving, man must have the power to choose. The reception of God’s love and of the gift of salvation through Jesus Christ can only be by an act of man’s free will.
Some argue that if it is God’s will for all men to be saved, the fact that all are not saved would mean that God’s will would be frustrated and His sovereignty overturned by men. It is also argued that if man can say yes or no to Christ, he has the final say in his salvation and his will is stronger than God’s will. One Calvinist theologian said, “The heresy of free will dethrones God and enthrones man.6
There is nothing in either the Bible or logic to suggest that God’s sovereignty requires man to be powerless to make a real choice—moral or otherwise. Giving man the power to make a genuine, independent choice does not diminish God’s control over His universe. Being omnipotent and omniscient, God certainly could so arrange circumstances as to keep man’s rebellion from frustrating His purposes. In fact, God could even use man’s free will to help fulfill His own plans and thereby be even more glorified. By saying that the only way God can truly be sovereign is to not allow man to have free will is actually diminishing God’s sovereignty and essentially saying God’s not powerful and big enough to bring about His purposes unless man has no free will.
God’s grand design from the foundation of the world to bestow upon man the gift of His love precludes any ability to force that gift upon any of His creatures. Both love and gifts of any kind must be received. Force perverts the transaction.
The fact that God cannot fail, lie, sin, change or deny Himself does not in the least diminish His sovereignty. Nor is He any the less sovereign because He cannot force anyone to love Him or to receive the gift of eternal life through Jesus Christ. And from man’s side, the reverse limitation prevails: there is nothing anyone can do to merit or earn either love or a gift. They must be given freely from God’s heart without any reason other than love, mercy, and grace.
Wonderfully, in His sovereign grace, God has so constituted man and has so designed a gift that man may receive it voluntarily by an act of his will and respond in love to God’s love. Someone has said, “The free-will of man is the most marvelous of the Creator’s works.”7 The power of choice opens the door to something wonderful beyond comprehension: genuine fellowship between God and man for eternity. Without a free will man could not receive the gift of eternal life, thus God could not give it to him.
Pusey points out that,
Without free-will, man would be inferior to the lower animals, which have a sort of limited freedom of choice. . . . It would be self-contradictory, that Almighty God should create a free agent capable of loving Him, without also being capable of rejecting His love . . . without free-will we could not freely love God. Freedom is a condition of love.8
It is the power of genuine choice from man’s own heart and will, which God has sovereignly given him, that enables God to love man and for man to receive that love and to love God in return “because he first loved us” (1 John:4:19).
It is impossible that the power of choice could challenge God’s sovereignty since it is God’s sovereignty that has bestowed this gift upon man and set the conditions for both loving and giving.
Suggesting that God would be lacking in “power” (thus denying His sovereignty) if He offered salvation and some rejected it is missing the point. Power and love do not belong in the same discussion. In fact, of the many things which we have seen that God cannot do, a lack of “power” is not the reason for any of them, nor is His sovereignty mitigated in the least by any of these.
Thus for mankind to have been given by God the power to choose to love Him or not and to receive or to reject the free gift of salvation, far from denying God’s sovereignty, is to admit what God’s sovereignty itself has lovingly and wonderfully provided.
May we willingly respond from the heart to His love with our love, and in gratitude for His great gift proclaim the good news to others.
Editors’ Appendix—Is Man Too Depraved to Love God?
The “T” in the Calvinist acronym T.U.L.I.P. stands for “total depravity.” In Bob Kirkland’s book, Calvinism: None Dare Call It Heresy, he states:
It is true that all people have depraved and sinful natures, and no person merits salvation. However, the word “total” means, “entirely, to the full.” The word “depraved” means “morally corrupt.” To suggest that all people in the world are “totally immoral” is ridiculous. None of the neighbors on the street where I live confess to be saved, but that does not make them totally immoral. . . . We must not forget that God has put a conscience in people so that we know or have a sense of right and wrong. Even an unsaved person can feel remorse and regret when he has done something wrong. If he was totally depraved, he would not have the capability to do that (see Romans 1: 19-20). . . .
To a Calvinist, total depravity means “total inability.” The common dictionary meaning of inability is, not having the quality or state of being able to do something. Calvinism says that because all mankind is “dead in trespasses and sins” (see Ephesians 2:1-4), man cannot respond in any way to receive Christ as their Savior.9
To order copies of What a Sovereign God Cannot Do, click here.
Endnotes
- Arthur W. Pink, The Sovereignty of God (Baker Book House, 1984), p. 240. (check page number or use kindle)
- Edwin H. Palmer, The Five Points of Calvinism (Baker Books, 1999), p. 25.
- Statement made by James White in Debating Calvinism: Five Points, Two Views by Dave Hunt and James White (Colorado Springs, CO: Multnomah Books; a division of Random House, 2004), p. 19.
- C. Norman Sellers, Election and Perseverance (Schoettle Publishing Co., 1987),
- Augustine of Hippo, The City of God (n.p.n.d.), V. 10.
- W. E. Best, Free Grace Versus Free Will (W. E. Best Books Missionary Trust, 1977), p. 35.
- Junius B. Reimensnyder, Doom Eternal (N.S. Quiney, 1880), p. 257; cited in Samuel Fisk, Calvinistic Paths Retraced (Biblical Evangelism [23] Press, 1985), p. 223.
- Edward B. Pusey, What Is of Faith as to Everlasting Punishment? (James Parker & Co., 1881), pp. 22-23; cited in Fisk, op. cit., p. 222.
- Bob Kirkland, Calvinism: None Dare Call It Heresy (Roseburg, OR: Lighthouse Trails Publishing, 2018), pp. 31-32.
|
Donating to Lighthouse Trails |
SUPPORTING LIGHTHOUSE TRAILS: For those who would like to support Lighthouse Trails, we always appreciate both your prayers and your giving. And for those who have faithfully done that over the years, we thank you with all of our hearts. We know that some people may have the impression that Lighthouse Trails does quite well financially because we sell products that we publish and because our resources have had such a far reach; but, the truth is, it takes everything made through sales to keep Lighthouse Trails operating. Publishing, at least for small presses such as ours, is rarely a high-profit business. It would take a best seller to see that, one that the masses of people love. And because we are not just a business, but even more so a ministry, we keep our prices as low as we can, give away many resources, and have also made much of our material available for free on the research site and blog. That's not how big corporations run things as that would hurt the bottom line (profit), but we see the needs out there, and we trust God to keep us going as long as He sees fit.
We thank you in advance for seeing the value in a ministry like Lighthouse Trails and coming along side us with your prayers and support.
It is our prayer that we will faithfully be humble servants of the Lord’s work for years to come should the Lord tarry. If you would like to donate to Lighthouse Trails, you may send a donation by mailing it to: Lighthouse Trails, P.O. Box 307, Roseburg, Oregon 97470. Or you may call 866/876-3910. There is also a donate option on our store website. (There is also a PayPal option on that page.)
Lighthouse Trails is not a non-profit 501 (c) 3 organization, so your donations will not be tax deductible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|